Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
"Summary: To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence... None of the facts, events, anomalies, or phenomena that have been listed, discussed, and analyzed in this book can be explained by airliner crashes, jet fuel fires, or any scheme of controlled demolition. A comparison of the 911 evidence collected with the evidence of results produced by the well-established Hutchison Effect shows that a similar technology was employed in the destruction of the towers..."--P. 483-484.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Where did the towers go?: evidence of directed free-energy technology on 9/11
2010, s.n.]
in English
0615412564 9780615412566
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
Table of Contents
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Work Description
The 9/11 event (2001) resulted in the "dustification"
of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex;
and this book presents the evidence
for what could have done this.
All conventional technologies are ruled out;
and, many of the features of the event
are similar to Hutchison Effects,
thereby leaving as the only possibility
that this "dustification" was done by
some classified "beam weapon."
If you are among those who have called for a
new, open, and independent 9/11 investigation,
this book is the only comprehensive
forensic investigation to date in the public domain.
The evidence presented in this book
was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case
that Dr. Wood filed (2007)
in which she accused the defendants of science fraud.
NIST was mandated by congress to
"Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed ..."
yet NIST admitted to Dr. Wood
that they did not analyze the "collapse."
The contractors they hired with taxpayer money
knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.
Sadly, this case had no support from the "Truth movement,"
leaving the judges free to ignore the law
in order to dismiss the case
(which they acknowledged they did)
so they could sweep it under the carpet.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?February 28, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | remove fake subjects |
July 14, 2017 | Edited by Mek | adding subject: Internet Archive Wishlist |
December 5, 2013 | Edited by Ph. Torrance | Added new cover |
December 5, 2013 | Edited by Ph. Torrance | added description, set in 2001 |
February 15, 2012 | Created by LC Bot | import new book |