Is the size of the universe depends on the size of our telescope? Only a very small objects with redshifts are detected in a vast universe that can only be considered infinite. Base on a rough measurement of radiation redshift observation. I doubt that we have sufficient information of hastening the fate of the universe and it's past. Isn't is overreaching?
An edition of From Redshift to Cosmic Background Radiation-Comprehensive Study Of Mysteries In Science
(2014)
From Redshift to Cosmic Background Radiation-Comprehensive Study Of Mysteries In Science
by Cres Huang
Share
×Close
Last edited by Cres Huang
December 2, 2016 | History
Proves the dominating nature of redshift detection in dynamic motion. Observed cosmic redshift is not the indication of expanding universe, nor blueshift meant contracting. In the meantime, higher frequency loss over distance also causes redshift, and it is exponential. Due to the astronomic distance of celestial observation, it is overwhelming and create an illusion of run-away universe. Since high frequency can not travel as far, space is filled with dominating low frequency below visible radiations, CBR, which can come from outside of the visible universe.
Publish Date
2014/11/19
Publisher
Cres Huang
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Subjects
mystery, science, paradox, blueshift, redshift, Doppler, CBR, CMB, inflation, space expansion, Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, cosmic background radiation, CSB| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
1
From Redshift to Cosmic Background Radiation-Comprehensive Study Of Mysteries In Science
2014/11/19, Cres Huang
PDF
9574320456 9789574320455
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
2 Creation of Doppler Effect
2.1 Limited Range of Doppler Blueshift
2.2 Mathematical Model of Blueshift Detection in Space
2.3 Probability Function of Blueshift Detection
2.4 Probability Distribution of Blueshift Detection
2.5 Underlying Conditions
2.6 Cross-Check with Redshift Survey
2.7 Probability Function in Surface Observation
2.8 Probability Function in Linear Observation
2.9 Probability Function Comparison
2.10 Properties of Doppler Effect
2.10.1 Properties of Doppler Blueshift
2.10.2 Properties of Doppler Redshift
3 Observer and the Environment
3.1 Doppler Effect of Rotating Observer
3.2 Environment Conditions
3.3 Heliosphere of The Solar System
3.4 Cross Radiations in Space
3.5 Sky In A Box
4 Lost in Translation
5 Cosmic Background Radiation
6 Conclusion
7 Appendixes
7.1 Paradox of Space Expansion
7.2 Real Life Analogy of Inertia in Expanding Space
7.3 Paradox of Redshift and Expanding Space
7.3.1 Real Life Analogy of Radiation Trap
7.4 Paradox of Constant Pulsating Quasars in Expanding Space
7.5 Mind-Bending Questions
7.6 Can We Really Tell The Size & Age of The Universe?
7.7 Accumulated Probability Distribution
References
Edition Notes
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Work Description
The dominating and exponential natures of radiation redshift do not suggest the acceleratingly physical departure of all astronomical objects; and, neither inflation nor a common origin. Universe will continue as is, no extra matter and energy needed. Otherwise, besides the demand of run-away energy; the interactions among energy, matter, run-away energy, run-away matter, and acceleratingly expanding the space to carry objects away can only lead to run-away interpretations.
Excerpts
added by Cres Huang.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?Lists
See All-
Cres
from Cres Huang
| December 2, 2016 | Edited by Cres Huang | Added new cover |
| November 18, 2016 | Edited by Cres Huang | tags and desc |
| November 17, 2015 | Edited by Cres Huang | update author and description |
| November 6, 2015 | Edited by Cres Huang | Edited without comment. |
| November 6, 2015 | Created by Cres Huang | Added new book. |