Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
"In Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe? John Lott provides long-awaited empirical analysis of predatory pricing. By examining firms accused of or convicted of predation over a thirty-year period, he shows that these firms are not organized as game-theoretic or other models of predation would predict. In contrast, what evidence exists for predation suggests that government enterprises are more of a threat and are more likely to engage in predatory behavior than private firms.
This work will be of great interest to economists, legal scholars, and antitrust policy makers."--BOOK JACKET.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
Previews available in: English
Subjects
Predatory pricing, Antitrust law, Prix imposes, Wucher, Verdrangungswettbewerb, Wettbewerbsrecht, Spieltheorie, Politique des prix, Concurrentiebeleid, Fixation, Concurrence, Juridische aspecten, Prix, Empirie, Droit, Prijsbeleid, Dumping (economie), Criminal justice, administration of, Courts, united states, Criminal law, united states, PricingPlaces
United StatesEdition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Are predatory commitments credible?: who should the courts believe?
1999, University of Chicago Press
in English
0226493555 9780226493558
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographical references (p. [155]-164) and index.
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?July 16, 2024 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
August 4, 2020 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
January 17, 2020 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
April 28, 2010 | Edited by Open Library Bot | Linked existing covers to the work. |
December 9, 2009 | Created by WorkBot | add works page |