An edition of Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assistant attorney-general, in case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montford C. Rerdell, Thomas J. Brady, and William H. Turner, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, August 24, 25, and 28, 1882 (1882)

Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assistant attorney-general, in case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montford C. Rerdell, Thomas J. Brady, and William H. Turner, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, August 24, 25, and 28, 1882.

by

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assis ...
Richard T. Merrick
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today
Notes
  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Notes

Buy this book

Last edited by Open Library Bot
December 6, 2010 | History
Edit
An edition of Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assistant attorney-general, in case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montford C. Rerdell, Thomas J. Brady, and William H. Turner, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, August 24, 25, and 28, 1882 (1882)

Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assistant attorney-general, in case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montford C. Rerdell, Thomas J. Brady, and William H. Turner, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, August 24, 25, and 28, 1882.

by

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
U.S.G.P.O.
Language
English
Pages
94

Buy this book

Subjects
Postal service, Star routes, Trials, litigation, Trials, litigation, etc
People
John W. Dorsey
Places
United States

Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?

Edition Availability
Cover of: Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assistant attorney-general, in case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montford C. Rerdell, Thomas J. Brady, and William H. Turner, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, August 24, 25, and 28, 1882.
Argument of Richard T. Merrick, special assistant attorney-general, in case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montford C. Rerdell, Thomas J. Brady, and William H. Turner, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, August 24, 25, and 28, 1882.
1882, U.S.G.P.O.
in English
  • Not in Library

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition Notes

"The defendants are charged with having conspired to defraud the United States. The means by which this defrauding was to be accomplished are certain contracts for carrying the mail over certain designated routes."--p. 3.

Published in
[Washington
Genre
Trials, litigation, etc.
Other Titles
Argument of Richard T. Merrick

Classifications

Library of Congress
LAW

The Physical Object

Pagination
94 p. ;
Number of pages
94

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL6331363M
LCCN
35037200

Source records

Library of Congress MARC record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
December 6, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Added subjects from MARC records.
February 5, 2010 Edited by WorkBot add more information to works
December 9, 2009 Created by WorkBot add works page