Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
This first book by a political theorist devoted exclusively to James's theory argues that political concerns were in fact central to his intellectual work. Joshua Miller links James to the contemporary public dialogue by treating him as a theorist of action and exploring the complexities of that theory.
He also relates the philosopher's thought to his own political experiences and observations and - by explicating, criticizing, and meditating on James - develops provocative new ideas about issues facing democracy today.
At the heart of the book is James's description of the "democratic temperament," which comprises a willingness to act, the placing of public good ahead of private comfort, generosity toward one's opponents, and mutual respect among citizens of different viewpoints, races, genders, classes, and religions.
Miller sees this temperament as a healthy corrective to the meanspiritedness that characterizes so much current political discourse, which is precisely what makes James's insights so relevant to today's political environment. By revealing how James speaks to the paradoxical condition of modern political existence - withdrawal from public life combined with fanatical action - Miller shows how James's views apply to the possibility and problems of reviving participatory democracy in our era.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Previews available in: English
Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Democratic temperament: the legacy of William James
1997, University Press of Kansas
in English
0700608311 9780700608317
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographical references (p. 121-162) and index.
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Source records
Internet Archive item recordLibrary of Congress MARC record
Better World Books record
marc_columbia MARC record
Work Description
This book draws out the politics of a philosopher who is rarely seen as political. James's vision of truth is remarkably similar to that of some post-modernists. James believed that there is a truth, but we could never be sure what it is. Therefore, we live our lives in accord with ideals that we hope are true. We cannot know. This doesn't mean that every truth is good; surely, that can't be right. James does take a stance against absolutism, and therefore against imperialism.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?August 7, 2024 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
May 26, 2022 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
December 13, 2019 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
June 3, 2011 | Edited by 64.121.206.113 | Edited without comment. |
December 10, 2009 | Created by WorkBot | add works page |