Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
"McCallum and Nelson's (2004) criticism of targeting rules for the analysis of monetary policy is rebutted. First, McCallum and Nelson's preference to study the robustness of simple monetary-policy rules is no reason at all to limit attention to simple instrument rules; simple targeting rules may have more desirable properties. Second, optimal targeting rules are a compact, robust, and structural description of goal-directed monetary policy, analogous to the compact, robust, and structural consumption Euler conditions in the theory of consumption. They express the very robust condition of equality of the marginal rates of substitution and transformation between the central bank's target variables. Third, under realistic information assumptions, the instrument-rule analogue to any targeting rule that McCallum and Nelson have proposed results in very large instrument-rate volatility and is also for other reasons inferior to a targeting rule"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Subjects
Mathematical models, Monetary policyShowing 2 featured editions. View all 2 editions?
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Targeting rules vs. instrument rules for monetary policy: what is wrong with McCallum and Nelson?
2004, National Bureau of Economic Research
Electronic resource
in English
|
zzzz
|
2
Targeting rules vs. instrument rules for monetary policy: what is wrong with McCallum and Nelson?
2004, National Bureau of Economic Research
in English
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
"September 2004."
Includes bibliographical references.
Also available in PDF from the NBER world wide web site (www.nber.org).
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?December 13, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
February 12, 2010 | Edited by WorkBot | add more information to works |
December 10, 2009 | Created by WorkBot | add works page |