[De]constructing Guastavino Vaulting

[De]constructing Guastavino Vaulting
Erin Murphy, Erin Murphy
Locate

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today


Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
December 15, 2022 | History

[De]constructing Guastavino Vaulting

This thesis analyzes the mortars used in the construction of Guastavino tile vault assemblies through an in-depth study of St. Paul’s Chapel and observations at five other Guastavino projects. Limited research has been published that addresses the mortars used in Guastavino vaults, but the available literature indicates that only gypsum mortar and Portland cement mortar were used in their construction. Furthermore, literature establishes that vaults were assembled by installing the first layer of tiles with gypsum mortar, while the above tile layers were set in Portland cement mortar. Preservation professionals often encounter discrepancies between this assembly described in literature and the assemblies and mortars observed during restoration projects. To address these discrepancies, this thesis performed a material study at St. Paul’s Chapel, identifying the mortars and their assembly through archival review, physical observation, and cursory petrographic analysis of select samples. It was determined that at least four different types of mortars, including gypsum mortar, gypsum-lime mortar, natural cement mortar, and portland cement mortar were used in the construction of St.

Paul’s Chapel. Furthermore, it was discovered that the used mortar types varied by the form and finish of different vaults at St. Paul’s Chapel. Similarly, in the supporting case studies, mortars other than gypsum mortar and portland cement mortar were identified, again varying based on the particularities of the assembly of each vault. The variety of these materials and assemblies illustrate the oversimplification of the description of Guastavino vault assemblies in published literature. This thesis therefore provides schematic section drawings of the studied vaults that identify the types of mortar used and their locations within the vault assembly. While only a fraction of the projects of the Guastavino Company were analyzed in this thesis, the chosen case studies clearly demonstrate that the company used mortars other than gypsum mortars and Portland cement mortars. Furthermore, this thesis establishes that the type of mortar used in a Guastavino project was intricately linked to the assembly method, and that both mortar and assembly varied based on the specific parameters of particular projects.

Publish Date
Language
English

Buy this book

Book Details


Edition Notes

Department: Historic Preservation.

Thesis advisor: Tim L.G Michiels.

Thesis (M.S.)--Columbia University, 2020.

Published in
[New York, N.Y.?]

The Physical Object

Pagination
1 online resource.

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL44011452M
OCLC/WorldCat
1222808321

Source records

marc_columbia MARC record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
December 15, 2022 Created by MARC Bot import new book