An edition of Law and objectivity (1992)

Law and Objectivity

  • 0 Ratings
  • 1 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 1 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
July 24, 2024 | History
An edition of Law and objectivity (1992)

Law and Objectivity

  • 0 Ratings
  • 1 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Is law "objective?" Should law be objective? These questions continue to generate argument and confusion. In this book, Kent Greenawalt clarifies the different senses in which law might be objective, and examines claims that it is so.

Greenawalt begins by considering skeptical views about the meaning of language. Inquiring into the language of legal standards and whether it can yield correct answers to legal problems, he explores how the language of authoritative standards can indicate a single correct resolution in some cases, but not in others.

The book's second part considers the ways in which the substance of the law may be more or less objective. One critical problem examined here concerns reliance on "objective" standards of "reasonable people," or standards that rely on particular characteristics of individuals. A second problem is whether standards of law treat various groups fairly.

A third involves appropriate levels of generality for legal standards, and the claim of some feminists that in its abstractness and generality the law is overly "masculine.".

In Part Three, Greenawalt discusses the relation between law and "external" standards of evaluation. He focuses on standards of community morality, economic efficiency, and sound moral and political philosophy, and shows that legal evaluation often includes the use of such standards. Greenawalt goes on to argue that claims stating legal questions always have correct answers must rest on similar claims that questions of moral and political philosophy also have such "objectively" correct answers.

He contends that many of the latter questions do have correct answers, based on best reasons that are generally accessible; extreme skepticism about the law's objectivity is thus unwarranted. He concludes, however, that other questions do not have answers that are correct in this sense; therefore not all legal questions can have correct answers

  1. An important discussion of fundamental issues in current legal philosophy, Law and Objectivity provides a historical overview that illuminates the development of jurisprudence in the English-speaking world over the last fifty years.
Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
304

Buy this book

Previews available in: English

Edition Availability
Cover of: Law and Objectivity
Law and Objectivity
May 30, 1995, Oxford University Press, USA
in English
Cover of: Law and objectivity
Law and objectivity
1992, Oxford University Press
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Classifications

Library of Congress

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL7387701M
Internet Archive
lawobjectivity00gree
ISBN 10
0195098331
ISBN 13
9780195098334
OCLC/WorldCat
33403949
Library Thing
1127221
Goodreads
1713577

Source records

Better World Books record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
July 24, 2024 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
July 31, 2020 Edited by ImportBot import existing book
July 31, 2020 Edited by ImportBot import existing book
April 28, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Linked existing covers to the work.
December 10, 2009 Created by WorkBot add works page