"Ex pede herculem"

an additional reply to the letter of the Rev. C.S. Grueber, to his grace the Archbishop of Canterbury, i [sic] which is shown that the argument from the catechism, as framed for the counsel for the venerable the Archdeacon of Taunton, apparently involves blasphemous conclusions, is founded on an erroneous representation of the discussion at the Savoy conference, and is confuted by the statements of Bishop Cosin, and Bishop Reynolds, who were distinguished opponents on that occasion

by Alfred Nicholas Bull