An edition of Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97 (2001)

Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97

by

Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio ...
S. Alex Covert, S. Alex Covert
Locate

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today
Notes
Notes

Buy this book

Last edited by WorkBot
December 15, 2009 | History
Edit
An edition of Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97 (2001)

Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97

by

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
Language
English
Pages
18

Buy this book

Subjects

Biotic communities, Ecology, Environmental aspects, Environmental aspects of Biotic communities, Environmental monitoring, Fishes, Geological Survey (U.S.), Ohio EPA

Places

Watershed Erie, Lake
Edition Availability
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English
Cover of: Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency fish-collection methods using the index of biotic integrity and modified index of well-being, 1996-97
2001, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services [distributor]
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition Notes

"National Water-Quality Assessment Program"

Includes bibliographical references (p. 16-17)

Published in
Columbus, Ohio, Denver, CO
Series
Water-resources investigations report -- 00-4255

The Physical Object

Pagination
vi, 18 p. :
Number of pages
18

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL17007245M

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
December 15, 2009 Edited by WorkBot link works
September 27, 2008 Created by ImportBot Imported from Miami University of Ohio MARC record