Why investigate the scientific and moral value of animal experimentation?
An edition of Brute Science
(1996)
Brute science
dilemmas of animal experimentation
by Hugh LaFollette
- 0 Ratings
- 0 Want to read
- 0 Currently reading
- 0 Have read
Share
×Close
Brute Science investigates whether biomedical research using animals is, in fact, scientifically justified. Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks examine the issues in scientific terms using the models that scientists themselves use. They argue that we need to reassess our use of animals and, indeed, rethink the standard positions in the debate.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Showing 3 featured editions. View all 3 editions?
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
1
Brute science: dilemmas of animal experimentation
2007, Routledge
in English
1003060005 9781003060000
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
2
Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation (Philosophical Issues in Science)
January 27, 1997, Routledge
in English
0415131138 9780415131131
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
3
Brute science: dilemmas of animal experimentation
1996, Routledge
in English
0415131138 9780415131131
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
"First published 1996 by Routledge"--Title page verso.
Includes bibliographical references.
Hugh LaFollette is Professor of Philosophy at East Tennessee State University; he is the author of Personal Relationships: Love, Identity, and Morality (1995) and editor of Ethics in Practice: An Anthology ( 1996). Niall Shanks is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Adjunct Professor of Biological Sciences at East Tennessee State University.
Classifications
External Links
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Excerpts
added anonymously.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?
History
- Created December 15, 2022
- 1 revision
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
| December 15, 2022 | Created by MARC Bot | Imported from marc_columbia MARC record |