Record ID | marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:29939489:2683 |
Source | marc_nuls |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:29939489:2683?format=raw |
LEADER: 02683cam 2200397Ii 4500
001 9925325905301661
005 20180924171927.9
008 180223t20182018enkac b 001 0 eng d
019 $a1007062779
020 $a9780500239773$q(hardback)
020 $a0500239770$q(hardback)
035 $a99977950005
035 $a(OCoLC)1026337176$z(OCoLC)1007062779
035 $a(OCoLC)on1026337176
040 $aERASA$beng$erda$cERASA$dYDX$dQGJ$dCDX$dQGJ$dBDX$dQQ3$dUAB$dCHVBK$dOCLCO$dGRU$dUKTTE$dOCLCF$dCGP$dMBB$dAVA$dUKOBU$dVP@$dNGU$dIBI$dOCLCA$dIGA$dTEU$dOCLCO
043 $ae-uk-en
050 4 $aND470$b.G39 2018
080 $a(411)75.036"194/197" GAY
082 04 $a759.2/1$223
100 1 $aGayford, Martin,$d1952-$eauthor.
245 10 $aModernists & mavericks :$bBacon, Freud, Hockney & the London painters /$cMartin Gayford.
246 3 $aModernists and mavericks
264 1 $aLondon ;$aNew York :$bThames & Hudson,$c2018.
264 4 $c℗♭2018
300 $a352 pages :$billustrations (some color), portraits ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
336 $astill image$bsti$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 340-345) and index.
505 00 $gIntroduction --$g1.$tYoung Lucian: art in wartime London --$g2.$tPope Francis --$g3.$tEuston Road in Camberwell --$g4.$tSpirit in the mass: the Borough Polytechnic --$g5.$tGirl with roses --$g6.$tLeaping into the void --$g7$tLife into art: Bacon and Freud in the 1950s --$g8.$tTwo climbers roped together --$g9.$tWhat makes the modern home so different? --$g10.$tAn arena in which to act --$g11.$tThe situation in London, 1960 --$g12.$tThe artist thinks: Hockney and his contemporaries --$g13.$tThe grin without the cat: Bacon and Freud in the 1960s --$g14.$tAmerican connections --$g15.$tMysterious conventionality --$g16.$tPortrait surrounded by artistic devices --$g17.$tShimmering and dissolving --$g18.$tThe non-existence of action --$gEpilogue.
520 $aThe development of painting in London from the Second World War to the 1970s has never before been told before as a single narrative. R. B. Kitaj's proposal, made in 1976, that there was a 'substantial School of London' was essentially correct but it caused confusion because it implied that there was a movement or stylistic group at work, when in reality no one style could cover the likes of Francis Bacon and also Bridget Riley.
650 0 $aPainting, English$zDalston (London, England)$y20th century.
651 0 $aLondon (England)$xIntellectual life$y20th century.
947 $hCIRCSTACKS$r31786103087679
980 $a99977950005