Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
We measure the value of shareholder proxy access by using a recent development in the ability of shareholders to nominate candidates for board seats. We use the SEC's October 4, 2010 announcement that it would significantly delay implementation of its August 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment. Because firms with substantial institutional ownership would have been most affected by the SEC's now-delayed changes, we use the share and composition of institutional investors to sort firms into those more and less affected by the October 4 news. Firms that would have been most affected by proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership, lost value on that day. The value drop was 55 basis points for a 10 percentage point change in activist institution ownership. These results suggest that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC's August 2010 Rule.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Showing 3 featured editions. View all 3 editions?
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value?: evidence from the business roundtable challenge
2011, Harvard Business School
in English
- 2nd rev.
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
2
Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value?: evidence from the business roundtable challenge
2011, Harvard Business School
in English
- Rev.
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
3
Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value?: evidence from the Business Roundtable Challenge
2010, Harvard Business School
in English
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
"November 2010"--Publisher's website.
Includes bibliographical references.
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Work Description
We use the Business Roundtable's challenge to the SEC's 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment to measure the value of shareholder proxy access. We find that firms that would have been most vulnerable to proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership and activist institutional ownership in particular, lost value on October 4, 2010, when the SEC unexpectedly announced that it would delay implementation of the Rule in response to the Business Roundtable challenge. We also examine intra-day returns and find that the value loss occurred just after the SEC's announcement on October 4. We find similar results on July 22, 2011, when the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the Business Roundtable. These findings are consistent with the view that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC's 2010 Rule.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?December 12, 2022 | Created by MARC Bot | import new book |