Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value?

evidence from the Business Roundtable Challenge

Does shareholder proxy access improve firm va ...
Bo Becker, Bo Becker
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today


Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
December 12, 2022 | History

Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value?

evidence from the Business Roundtable Challenge

We measure the value of shareholder proxy access by using a recent development in the ability of shareholders to nominate candidates for board seats. We use the SEC's October 4, 2010 announcement that it would significantly delay implementation of its August 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment. Because firms with substantial institutional ownership would have been most affected by the SEC's now-delayed changes, we use the share and composition of institutional investors to sort firms into those more and less affected by the October 4 news. Firms that would have been most affected by proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership, lost value on that day. The value drop was 55 basis points for a 10 percentage point change in activist institution ownership. These results suggest that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC's August 2010 Rule.

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
43

Buy this book

Book Details


Edition Notes

"November 2010"--Publisher's website.

Includes bibliographical references.

Published in
[Boston]
Series
Working paper / Harvard Business School -- 11-052, Working paper (Harvard Business School) -- 11-052.

The Physical Object

Pagination
43 p.
Number of pages
43

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL45314759M
OCLC/WorldCat
691917250

Work Description

We use the Business Roundtable's challenge to the SEC's 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment to measure the value of shareholder proxy access. We find that firms that would have been most vulnerable to proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership and activist institutional ownership in particular, lost value on October 4, 2010, when the SEC unexpectedly announced that it would delay implementation of the Rule in response to the Business Roundtable challenge. We also examine intra-day returns and find that the value loss occurred just after the SEC's announcement on October 4. We find similar results on July 22, 2011, when the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the Business Roundtable. These findings are consistent with the view that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC's 2010 Rule.

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
December 12, 2022 Created by MARC Bot import new book